Research Paper Introduction, Stages and Rubric

Research Paper Stages:

Stages:
1. A brief Proposal with a one-page description answering: why are you writing? Include an annotated bibliography in Chicago style (Turabian).

2. The Opening of the paper read out-loud in class.

3. A full Draft of the paper brought to class (2 copies) for peer review.

4. Class Presentation.

5. Submission of the Final version.


Check your Class's
Course Central for due dates.

UMF's Academic
Integrity Policy


Suggestions for Writing
a Strong Paper

(Read prior to beginning
the Paper Proposal Stage.)


Research Paper Introduction and Rubric:

Introduction:
The Research Paper is your opportunity to develop expertise in a specific area. To achieve this we will use the same method a scholar employs to write a journal article: an idea developed over time through presentation and peer-reviewed drafts. Our process will involve: Proposal, Opening, Draft, Presentation, and Final Version. (See sidebar).

Rubric for the Final Paper:
A: Outstanding:
You demonstrate authority in a specific area through a clear and compelling thesis. The paper is near (at) the level of an undergraduate journal such as the UMF Historian. The bibliography has developed over the semester and represents diverse source types; the paper successfully implements the Chicago style.

B: Good:
A clear and interesting read. The paper goes beyond a summary of sources, yet may be lacking in some areas. The bibliography has developed over the semester and represents diverse source types; the paper successfully implements the Chicago style.

C: Satisfactory to Limited:
A 'C' paper leans toward presenting facts at the expense of larger ideas. Bibliography is okay, but might lack depth (usually overly dependent on websites). Presentation is generally clear but may have a few trouble spots, re-reading is often necessary. The paper successfully implements the Chicago style.

D or F: Poor to Failing:
A paper in this category may have one or more of the following: the reader struggles to understand the paper; the thesis is unintelligible, weakly supported, or contradictory; the bibliography is weak. Note: a paper without bibliography/footnotes is considered plagiarism.

Breadcrumbs: Music History Assignments Overview - Blogging - Participation - Research Paper | Page Updated on: 1/28/06 | Email Steve