![]() |
Michael K. JohnsonEnglish 297: Literature and Film, Fall 2005MeetsRoberts 131 Required texts
|
Literature
and Film involves the study of filmed adaptations of literary works,
with an
emphasis on investigating the narrative and artistic similarities of
literature
and film as well as the unique characteristics of each medium. As
Literature
and Film is an English course, one of our primary goals will be to
carry out
that investigation through short essays that will also help you to
continue to
develop your writing skills. We also will work to develop in general
the
vocabulary and techniques of both literary and cinematic analysis
characteristic
of a sophisticated understanding and appreciation of literature and
film, and
we will work to develop the ability to use that vocabulary within the
specialized writing situation of the analytical essay. By the end of
the
course, I hope that you will have developed the skills that will make
you a
more analytical and critical spectator and reader.
The
analysis of films adapted from works of literature is rapidly becoming
its own
field of study, one that draws concepts and vocabulary from both of the
more
established disciplines of cinema and literary studies, and one that is
also
developing its own specialized vocabulary and theoretical principles.
In
choosing books and films for the course, I have emphasized pairings that will enable us to discuss the art,
craft, and politics involved in transforming a literary text into a
cinematic
one. In the first part of the course, we will focus on a single
book/movie pair
(fiction by Sherman Alexie and Smoke Signals, the film based on
that
book). Later, we will look at two books (Emma and Frankenstein)
that have provided source material for multiple adaptations, and we
will use
those often very different versions of these books as a way into
discussing
different theories for classifying adaptations. We will also ask what
the
differences between a book and its filmed adaptation--and between one
adaptation of a book and another--reveal about the political,
historical, and
social context in which the film was produced.
Finally,
we will turn to J.K. Rowling’s popular Harry Potter series, which has
also
spawned a number of films, including the forthcoming Harry Potter
and the
Goblet of Fire. We will focus primarily on discussing award-winning
director Alfonso Cuaron’s interpretation of Harry Potter and the
Prisoner of
Azkaban, but we will also want to discuss how different directors
throughout the series of Harry Potter films have interpreted and
represented
differently on screen such repeated elements of the series as the
setting of
Hogwarts and individual characters. Thus, I recommend (but do not
require)
viewing the first two films of the series. As a class, we will watch Harry
Potter and the Goblet of Fire when it opens in November.
Grades
will be determined primarily by your performance on three essays. The
first two
essays will account for 25% of your final course grade and the third
essay for
30%. Such factors as attendance, quiz performance, response essays,
participation, and preparedness will contribute to the final 20% of the
course
grade. As this class is process as well as product oriented, your
participation
in all aspects of that process (reading, discussing, and actively
watching the
films as well as writing) is essential to the completion of the course
requirements. When we watch movies, the class will be divided into
smaller
groups with each group responsible for analyzing particular elements
(e.g.,
lighting, or special effects) of the film. Even if you have seen a film
before,
we need you here to contribute your part to the analysis of the film as
a
whole. Excessive absences (more than two), excused or unexcused, will
damage
your course grade, and I reserve the right to lower any person's
semester grade
if that person has more than two unexcused absences.
Quizzes:
There will be reading quizzes over each book. We also will have
periodic
quizzes over the films, which may also include questions to test your
understanding of the terminology and vocabulary we will be using for
our
discussions. Quizzes will be in the form of a 15-20 minute written
response to
a general question, a short 5-10 minute response to a list of objective
questions, or a response paper discussing a film that we’ve screened.
Additionally,
you will be required to write a short (approximately 250 words)
response essay
for most of the full-length films. These response essays will provide a
major
contribution to your participation grade. The essays will be
descriptive and
analytical and focused on a particular topic. That topic will usually
derive
from the element of film that you've been assigned to pay attention to
for a
particular movie. Thus, your response paper might involve a description
and
analysis of the costumes used in Smoke Signals. These response
papers
will be written in class and will be based on the notes you take while
watching
the films.
For
papers, I assign letter grades that can be translated in terms of the
following numerical values: C− (72), C (75), C+ (78). There are some
exceptions to this pattern. An F corresponds to the numerical grade of
50. An assignment that is not completed will receive a grade of
zero. Because the grade D− does not exist for me, a D grade will
be assigned the value of 62. An A will be assigned the numerical value
100, an A− 95.
The DVDs of the films will be placed on reserve at Mantor Library. Rooms and equipment are available for viewing the films in the library. After the screening, I won't put the film on reserve until we're through discussing it in class. Watching more than once a film that you are going to be writing about is a good idea, and all the films will be available for reviewing at Mantor.
Please note that any student who needs accommodations in this course because of a disability should notify me at the beginning of the semester so that arrangements can be made.
As the publicity surrounding historian Stephen Ambrose's failure to use quotation marks to indicate direct quotations from the work of other historians indicates, borrowing someone else's words without appropriate acknowledgement is still frowned upon—despite the fact that the internet has made such intellectual theft easier than ever before. I expect students to act "in good faith" in doing original written work for the class. If a student violates that trust (even if it only involves a sentence or two lifted from an internet source without properly acknowledging the original), the punishment for plagiarism will be at minimum a failing grade on a particular assignment and at maximum failure of the course.